The Effect Of Liquidity Management On The Profitability Of Deposit Taking Financial Institutions In Kenya
Abstract
Robustness of the financial system is indispensable in ensuring the economic growth and
stability of any given country. Liquidity risk management is one of the key aspects that
influence, not only the profitability of a financial institution, but also its sustainability and
reputation. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of liquidity management ratios on
the profitability of deposit taking financial institutions in Kenya. Specific objectives of the study
were to assess the effect of current ratio, liquid ratio, loans to deposit ratio and loans to asset
ratio on profitability of deposit taking financial institutions in Kenya. Additionally, the study
evaluated the moderating role of management efficiency on the relationship between liquidity
and profitability of deposit taking financial institutions in Kenya. The study applied a descriptive
research design and targeting 38 commercial banks and 6 DTMs, all with data spanning five
years between 2012 and 2016. Secondary data utilized in this study was collected from the
published financial statements of these institutions. The study employed panel regression
analysis model using Stata statistical software. The data analysis process entailed exploratory
analysis, pre-test diagnostics, fitting of the model and post-test diagnostics. The outcome of the
analysis has been presented in tables and figures and interpreted appropriately.Study findings
indicated that current ratio did not have a significant effect oneither ROA (β = -0.6748; p >
0.05), ROE (β = -1.8589; p > 0.05) or NIM (β = -0.3881; p > 0.05). Liquid ratio had a significant
positive effect on both ROA (β = 6.6098; p < 0.05) and NIM (β = 2.6504; p < 0.05)but had no
significant effect on ROE (β = -5.9980; p > 0.05). Further, loans to deposit ratio had no
significant effect on neither ROA(β = -0.0782; p > 0.05), ROE (β = -0.0017; p > 0.05) nor
NIM(β = -0.0513; p > 0.05).Additionally, loans to assets ratio had no significant effect on ROA
(β = -0.3262; p > 0.05) but had a negative and significant effect on ROE (β = -4.8505; p < 0.05)
and a positive and significant effect on NIM(β = 0.0004; p < 0.05). The study recommends that
financial institutions should ensure that they maintain a liquidity ratio that is enough to comply
with CBK regulations and at the same time ensuring an optimum liquidity level to minimize the
institution’s liquidity risks. The institution’s past liquidity ratio levels and the institution’s
performance and risk indicators should be analyzed and this evidence used in arriving at the
optimum liquidity levels that are best suited for the context of the institution.